At the beginning of this month, I delivered the annual Alfred Edersheim lecture in Melbourne and Sydney. The title of the talk was 'Pentecost and the Plan of God'. According to Jewish reckoning, Pentecost this year falls today, Wednesday 15 May. According to the Bible, Pentecost or Shavuot, falls exactly fifty days after the Sabbath
following Passover, so it is the only festival of the Lord to which no date is
assigned. Israel was to count fifty days from Passover, so that in celebrating Pentecost
they would never forget the festival of their redemption.
The purpose
of the lecture was to explore the relevance of the festival of Shavuot today in
an attempt to relate the events that took place on the Day of Pentecost in the
year 33AD to the plan and purpose of God for the world he created. What follows is the lecture.
According
to Jewish tradition Pentecost, or Shavuot, the Feast of Weeks, is Zeman Matan Torateinu: the ‘Season of
the giving of our Torah’. In Acts 2, Luke appears to depict the events of the
Day of Pentecost as a second ‘Mount Sinai experience’ for Israel. For example,
both the Torah and the Spirit were given on mountains: the Law at Sinai and the
Spirit on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
In the
account of the giving of the Torah in Ex. 19:18-20, fire and the sound of a
trumpet accompanied the descent of God on Mount Sinai. In Acts 2:2-3, the
descent of the Spirit was accompanied by fire and a sound; a sound ‘like a
rushing, mighty wind.’ It is significant that Luke does not say there was a ‘rushing, mighty wind’ but a sound ‘like a rushing, mighty wind.’
According
to the rabbis, the world was divided into seventy nations and in tractate Shabbat 88b, the Talmud states, ‘Every
single word that went forth from the Omnipotent was split up into seventy
languages for the nations of the world.’ In Acts 2:4-5, the disciples of Jesus
spoke words in the languages of ‘devout men from
every nation under heaven.’
There was,
however, a significant contrast between the giving of the Torah and the giving
of the Spirit. In Ex. 32, after Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the Ten
Commandments, 3,000 men of Israel died because of the sin of the golden calf. By
contrast, in Acts 2:41, when the Holy Spirit was given, 3,000’ received the
word’ and were baptised; in other words 3,000 people became spiritually alive
in Messiah. This contrast is developed by Paul in 2Cor. 3, where he contrasts
the Old Covenant and the New Covenant, the Law and the Gospel, ‘the letter’ and
‘the Spirit.’ The Old Covenant, says Paul, ministered death whereas the New
Covenant ministers life. The outpouring of the Spirit of God on that momentous
day generated a movement which was to spread through the world, toppling an
empire and ministering life to countless millions until ultimately the whole earth
will be ‘filled with the knowledge of the glory of the LORD as the waters cover the sea.’
What I
propose to do in this lecture is to demonstrate that he events recorded in the
second chapter of Acts reveal that Pentecost was the fulfilment of five
distinct Old Testament elements: a Promise, a Psalm, a Pattern, a Plan and,
finally, Pentecost itself.
1. Pentecost was the fulfilment of a Promise
From the
very first page of the Bible God’s Ruach – his ‘Spirit’ or ‘Breath’ or ‘Wind’ –
is at work at pivotal points such as Creation, when the Ruach hovered over the
unformed and unfilled earth. At the Exodus, the Spirit of God empowered
Bezaleel and his helpers to construct the tabernacle and the things pertaining
to the worship of God; in Num. 11, the Spirit empowered the seventy elders of
Israel, and Eldad and Medad, to prophesy – an event that made Moses wish all
God’s people were prophets, a wish that came true at Pentecost. The Ruach was also
at work at the establishment of the Hebrew monarchy when he came upon David in
power and enabled him to conquer the Philistine giant Goliath. The work of God
is never accomplished by human might or power but always by the Ruach of God.
In the New
Testament, the Spirit was central in the ministry of Messiah and his apostles.
In Lk. 1:35, the Spirit overshadowed Mary causing her to conceive the Messiah; in
Mt. 3:16 the Spirit anointed Jesus at the Jordan river, setting him apart as
Messiah; in Mt. 12:28, Lk. 11:20 and Acts 10:38 the Spirit empowered Jesus for
his messianic ministry; in Heb. 9:14 the Spirit sustained Jesus for his atoning
death, and Rom. 8:11 states that the Spirit raised Jesus from the dead. It is
hardly surprising, therefore, that the Spirit of God was present at the
beginning of the God’s mission to the nations. The pouring out of the Spirit on
the Day of Pentecost was the fulfilment of at least two biblical promises made
to Israel, the first being the promise of Joel 2:28-32:
And it shall come to pass
afterward, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your
daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, and your young men
shall see visions. Even on the male and female servants in those days I will
pour out my Spirit…
However, Joel
2 was not the only prophetic scripture fulfilled at Pentecost. The proclamation
of the Word of the Lord to the house of Israel and the Ruach breathing life
into 3,000 souls was a fulfilment of Ezek. 37:1-14, in which Israel is pictured
as a heap of dry bones. In the vision, God promises to recall his people from
exile, following which he will breathe life into them and cause them to become a
great army. According to vv 27 - 28, God’s dwelling place will be among
resurrected Israel; he will be their God, they will be his people and, when his
sanctuary is in their midst forever, the nations will know that he is ‘the LORD who sanctifies Israel.’ Israel’s promised resurrection was to have an
effect on the nations.
2. Pentecost was the fulfilment of a Psalm
Commentators
on the book of Acts recognise a symbolic significance in the sound like a wind
and the tongues of fire, and various interpretations of the symbols have been suggested
but few interpreters, if any, link the phenomena to Ps. 104:4, which states
that God ‘makes his messengers winds, his ministers a flaming fire.’
In the
readings for Pentecost, the Church of England’s Book of Common Prayer includes
verses 25-37 of Ps. 104 but, interestingly, not verse 4! But how fitting that with
the coming of the Spirit, God’s messengers and servants should be initiated
into their roles by the very elements God uses as his messengers and servants.
God had spoken to Elijah 800 years before the events of Acts 2 through a ‘still,
small voice’ rather than fire and a howling wind but at Pentecost he spoke with
the unrestrained might and power of a spiritual tornado that uprooted three
thousand observant Jews and Gentile proselytes from the kingdom of darkness and
transferred them into the kingdom of his Son.
3. Pentecost was the fulfilment of a Pattern
One of the
most divisive issues within Evangelicalism today is Supersessionism or, as it
is more commonly known, ‘Replacement Theology.’ Put simply, ‘Replacement
Theology’ is the idea that ‘the Church’ has replaced Israel in the plans and
purposes of God and that all the promises and privileges that belonged to the
Jewish people prior to the coming of Messiah have been spiritualised and transferred
to a new ‘spiritual’ Israel. Some years ago, on Whit Sunday, the churches in a
small town on the south coast of England organised a street party, complete with
party games and jelly and ice cream, to celebrate ‘the birthday of the Church.’
The idea was to attract locals in the hope (I presume) that they, like the
crowd that gathered at Pentecost in Jerusalem 2,000 years ago, would want to
know how to be saved. Apart from the fact that the Holy Spirit is a hard act to
follow, was the Church really born on the Day of Pentecost in 33AD?
Look up the
word ‘church’ in an English Dictionary and you will probably read that the word
is based on a medieval Greek term kuriakon
doma, meaning the ‘Lord’s house’. Ask a Christian what ‘church’ is and the
response will more than likely be that ‘Church’ is people not a building.’ Ask a
non-Christians what ‘church’ is and the answer will probably be that it is a
building. Theologically, the Christian is correct but from the point of view of
linguistics, the non-Christian is right.
How would
the disciples of Jesus have understood his declaration in Mt. 16:18, ‘I will
build my church’? Although Mt. 16:18
is the first occurrence of the word ‘church’ in the Bible, none of the apostles
asked what a ‘church’ was. The Greek word ekklesia,
translated ‘church’ in Mt. 16, means an ‘assembly,’ or ‘congregation.’ But Jesus,
of course, would have been speaking in Hebrew or Aramaic, not in Greek, and the
term he would have used was one with which his Jewish disciples would have been
very familiar, Qahal.
In the Old
Testament, Israel was God’s qahal,
his ‘assembly.’ When the Hebrew Scriptures were translated into Greek in the
third century BC, the translators of the Septuagint, as the Greek version was
known, used ekklesia to translate qahal. ‘Church,’ in that sense, therefore,
was a concept with which the disciples of Jesus were very familiar and, according
to Stephen in Acts 7:38, God had an ekklesia,
a ‘church’ or ‘assembly’ in the wilderness; that assembly being Israel. We must
not think, therefore, that the Church was born at Pentecost in 33AD or that the
Church has replaced Israel as the people of God. From the time of the Exodus,
Israel was God’s ‘church,’ or assembly, and continues to be so.
If that
sounds confusing, it might be helpful for us to look at the subject from
another perspective.
Jer. 11:16 depicts
Israel as ‘a green olive tree, beautiful with good fruit,’ and in Rom.
11:16-22, Paul draws on Jeremiah’s imagery to speak of Israel as an ‘olive tree’
of which Jewish individuals are the branches. Those Jews, or ‘natural branches,’
who refused to embrace their Messiah were broken off but believing Gentiles – like
branches from an uncultivated olive tree – were grafted onto the cultivated olive
tree of Israel. Whether cultivated or uncultivated, both varieties of branch are
joined to the same tree and are nourished by the same sap that comes from the
roots of the tree, namely the Patriarchs. At Pentecost, God did not cut down
one olive tree and plant a new one, called the Church; he began to call people
from all nations, not just from Israel, to be part of his beautiful green olive
tree in order they might produce good fruit.
Something
new did come into existence at Pentecost, however: a spiritual temple. In the
Old Testament, a developing pattern may be discerned in the way God meets with
his people. Before the Fall, God met and communed with Adam and Eve in the
Garden of Eden. After the expulsion from Eden, Cain and Abel approached God as
individuals, each at their own altar. After the call of Abraham, worship began
to take place at a family altar and the mark of the faith of the patriarchs (as
we observe in Gn. 12:8; 13:12; 26:17, 25; 33:18-20) was that they each pitched
their tent, built their altar and called on the name of the Lord
At the Exodus,
the family altar was replaced by a national shrine. The people lived in tents
and, under the direction of the Lord, a tabernacle was constructed where his
people might meet with their God. When the people settled in the land and began
to live in permanent dwellings, Solomon erected a temple of stone to serve as
the house of God.
Following
the destruction of the temple in 586 BC, God foretold in Ezek. 40-48 that a
better, bigger and perfect temple would be constructed, out of which would flow
a river of healing water (47:1-12). There are biblical interpreters who insist Ezekiel’s
vision must be interpreted in a strictly literalistic manner but such an
approach raises a number of serious difficulties. According to Ezekiel's
measurements, the temple will be so large that both the Temple Mount and the
Mount of Olives will have to be enlarged and expanded in order to accommodate
it. A clue to understanding the true nature of Ezekiel’s vision can be found in
Jn. 2:19, where Jesus speaks of his body as the temple. And in Jn. 7:38, on the
final day of the feast of Tabernacles, Jesus declares: ‘Whoever believes in me,
as the Scripture has said, “Out of his heart will flow rivers of living
water”.’
‘This,’
says John, Jesus ‘said about the Spirit, whom those who believed in him were to
receive, for as yet the Spirit had not been given, because Jesus was not yet
glorified.’ The Spirit was ‘given,’ of course, at Pentecost but which
‘Scripture’ foretold the Spirit flowing like a river of living water out of the
hearts of those that believe in Messiah? The only Old Testament passage that
speaks of ‘living water’ flowing out of anything is Ezek. 47:1-12, in which a
river of water flows from the temple of God bringing life to wherever it flows.
A series of
New Testament texts, including Mt. 24:1-2; 26:61; Acts 6:14; Eph. 2:19-22; 1
Pet. 2:4-8; Rev. 22:1-5, lead us to conclude that The Body of Messiah,
comprised of living stones, is the new temple, a ‘habitation of God in the
Spirit’, out of which flows living water for the healing of the nations. At
Pentecost, the Spirit began to flow from the followers of Jesus in the temple
where multitudes were observing Shavuot, to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and,
ultimately, to the uttermost parts of the earth.
In Ex. 40,
when the tabernacle was erected, a cloud of glory authenticated it as the
dwelling place of God. When Solomon dedicated the temple in 2 Chron. 7, fire
fell from heaven and the glory of God filled the place. In Acts 2, God authenticated
his new, living temple with a glory even greater than that of the previous
temples. At Pentecost, God dedicated and authenticated his living temple that was
destined to fill the entire world, not simply the Temple Mount and the Mount of
Olives. And whereas, in times gone by, God was encountered in particular
locations such as Eden, the altar, the tabernacle and the temple, since
Pentecost Jews and Gentiles may meet with him not so much in a universal temple
but as living stones in that temple.
The temple
reminded people of Eden. It was built on a mountain from which flowed the
Kidron stream and its architecture included cherubim, palm trees, gourds and
other plants and flowers. It was a representation of Eden from which had flowed
four rivers. The single river that flowed from Ezekiel’s temple caused trees to
grow in the wilderness, the leaves of which brought healing. In John’s parallel
vision in the final chapter of the Bible, the river flows from a temple city,
the New Jerusalem, and on either side of the river grows the tree of life with
twelve kinds of fruit, yielding fruit every month. Even the leaves of the tree bring
healing to the nations. Little wonder, then, that the hymn writer Isaac Watts
wrote that in Jesus ‘the tribes of Adam boast more blessings than their father
lost’!
4. Pentecost was the fulfilment of a Plan
Immediately
after the fall of man, in Gn. 3:15, God announced his plan to redeem his fallen
creation. The call of Abraham was part of the divine redemptive plan, the end
of which was that all the families of the earth would be blessed (Gn. 12:3).
Israel’s calling was a missionary calling and the nation is described in Jer.
2:3 as ‘the firstfruits of [the Lord’s] increase’ that is, the firstfruits of
God’s harvest from among all nations.
In Jer.
4:1-4, the Lord declared that Israel’s relationship to him would have a
beneficial effect on the Gentiles:
‘If you will return, O Israel,’
says the LORD, ‘return
to Me; and if you will put away your abominations out of My sight, Then you
shall not be moved. And you shall swear, ‘The LORD lives,’ in truth, in judgment, and in righteousness; the nations shall
bless themselves in Him, and in Him they shall glory.’
God’s plan
of redemption is fundamental to understanding Ps.67:
God be merciful to us and bless us,
and cause His face to shine upon us. That your way may be known on earth, your
salvation among all nations. Let the peoples praise You, O God; let all the
peoples praise you. Oh, let the nations be glad and sing for joy! For you shall
judge the people righteously, and govern the nations on earth… Then the earth
shall yield her increase; God, our own God, shall bless us… and all the ends of
the earth shall fear Him.
The first
two verses of Ps. 67 remind us of the High Priestly benediction of Num.
6:24-26:
The LORD bless you and keep you;
The LORD make His face shine upon you, and be gracious to you;
The LORD lift up His countenance upon you, and give you peace.
They also
bring to mind Gn. 12:1-3:
Now the LORD had said to Abram: ‘Get out of your
country, from your family and from your father’s house, to a land that I will
show you. I will make you a great nation; I
will bless you and make your name great; and you shall be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and
I will curse him who curses you; and in you all the families of the earth shall
be blessed.’
God
repeated the promise to Isaac in Gn. 26:4: ‘… in your seed all nations of the
earth shall be blessed.’ He made the same promise to Jacob in Gn. 28:14: ‘… in
you and in your seed all families of earth shall be blessed.’
According
to Genesis, before the nations could be blessed, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had
to be blessed. At every festival the high priest blessed the people and in Ps.
67 the promise of the blessing of the nations is clarified. The blessing God
has in mind for the nations is nothing less than their salvation. Could God
have had anything less in mind when he promised to bless Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob and their descendants? Could he have anything less in mind when he blessed
the people through their High Priest?
The
psalmist recognised that although God had blessed Israel in many ways, the
nation did not possess the blessings invoked by the high priest in their
fulness. Moreover, the nations were not saved.
Israel
could not enjoy the blessings of Num. 6:24-26 in their fulness, nor could the
nations be saved until Messiah, the seed of Abraham came. And Ps. 67 is a
prayer that Israel will be blessed fully and that the nations will know God’s salvation,
his Yeshua! In the songs recorded in the first two chapters of Luke’s Gospel, it
becomes evident that with the birth of Yeshua, the invocations of the Aaronic
benediction and the pleas of Ps. 67:1-2 were being answered.
In Ps. 67:1,
the Hebrew poet appeals to God to show chanan
– grace, or
mercy – to Israel.
In the Magnificat of Lk. 1:46-55, remembering that Mary spoke Hebrew, she sings:
My soul magnifies the Lord, and my
spirit rejoices in God my Saviour… his mercy
[which in Hebrew would have been chanan]
is for those who fear him from generation to generation… He has helped his
servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy [chanan], as he spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his
offspring forever.
In Lk
1:67-79, the blessings of Ps. 67, the high priestly blessing and the promise to
Abraham all come together in the Song of Zechariah:
Blessed be the Lord God of Israel,
for he has visited and redeemed his people and has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his
servant David, as he spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets from of old, that
we should be saved from our enemies
and from the hand of all who hate us; to show the mercy promised to our fathers and to remember his holy
covenant, the oath that he swore to our father Abraham, to grant us that we,
being delivered from the hand of our enemies, might serve him without fear, in
holiness and righteousness before him all our days. And you, child, will be
called the prophet of the Most High; for you will go before the Lord to prepare
his ways, to give knowledge of salvation to his people in the
forgiveness of their sins, because of the tender mercy of our God, whereby the sunrise shall visit us from on high to give light to those who sit in
darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace.
According
to Ps. 67, as it goes with Israel so it goes with the nations, and the Psalmist
appeals to God to bless Israel. Before the nations can be blessed through the
knowledge of Yeshua Israel must be blessed and the New Testament constantly emphasises
the principle ‘to the Jew first,’ as Peter declares in Acts 3:24-26:
All the prophets… proclaimed these
days. You are the sons of the prophets and of the covenant that God made with
your fathers, saying to Abraham, ‘And in your offspring shall all the families
of the earth be blessed.’ God, having
raised up his servant, sent him to you first, to bless you by turning every
one of you from your wickedness."
There is a
pattern in Ps. 67: Israel is blessed; then the nations are saved; then ‘Israel’s
God’ blesses Israel. Paul reveals a similar framework of thought in Romans 11: Israel
has been blessed but has rejected the blessing; the nations are being saved and
are rejoicing in God’s salvation and this will ‘provoke Israel to jealousy’. At
the moment, says Paul, only a remnant of Israel believes the gospel but that
will not always be the case. There will be a fulness. ‘All Israel will be saved’.
God has
called Gentiles to provoke Israel to jealousy. That is our duty.
Although
tongues might at first reading appear to be the predominant phenomenon on the
day of Pentecost, tongues were not most important feature; the preaching of the
gospel was the crucial factor on that day. The gospel was preached to the Jews
first but by the time the book of Acts closes the nations are blessing
themselves in the Lord and glorying in him. Pentecost was the launch pad for
the final stage of God’s plan for world redemption, a plan that has nothing
less as its goal than the salvation of the nations and the liberation of the
cosmos itself from the effects of the fall of Adam.
5. Pentecost was the fulfilment of Pentecost
Shavuot/Pentecost,
like the other festivals of the Lord, was highly symbolic festival. It was the
second of the annual pilgrim festivals at which every male Israelite was to
appear before the face of God at the house of God in Jerusalem. The ‘place’ in
which the 120 believers were when the Spirit fell on the Day of Pentecost in
Acts 2 was the temple. The temple was the only place in which observant Jews
would have been on the morning the Ruach of God came upon the disciples of
Jesus. Had the 120 been in an upper room in another part of Jerusalem, those in
the temple would have been unaware of the sound of the wind and the tongues of
fire, and Peter certainly would not have been able to address thousands of his
fellow Jews in the confines of Jerusalem’s narrow streets.
Shavuot was
originally a harvest festival but by the first century of our era, as the
Jewish people had become scattered among the nations, the festival had lost its
primary harvest significance and become ‘the season of the giving of the law’
at Sinai. It is surely significant, then, that at the time when the Torah
passage for Shavuot was being read in the temple the Spirit came down on Mount
Zion. The Torah reading would have included Ex. 19:18:
Now Mount Sinai was wrapped in smoke because the LORD had descended on it in fire. The smoke of it went up like the smoke of a kiln, and the whole
mountain trembled greatly. And as the
sound of the trumpet grew louder and louder, Moses spoke, and God answered
him in thunder. The LORD came down
on Mount Sinai, to the top of the mountain.
Nevertheless,
the harvest significance had not disappeared and two wheat loaves made from the
firstfruits of the wheat harvest were waved before God in the temple.
At both
Passover and Pentecost, firstfruits were presented to God as wave offerings in
the temple. The offering presented the day after the Sabbath of Passover week,
as specified in Lv. 23:10-14 was the firstfruits of the barley harvest, and
barley was considered the poor man’s food. The firstfruits offering at Shavuot
was from the wheat harvest, and in Ps. 81:16 wheat is the rich man’s food. In 1
Cor. 15:21-23, when Paul describes Messiah as the ‘firstfruits from the dead’
he is likening Messiah’s resurrection to the Passover firstfruits offering, which
was presented to God on the very day Jesus rose from the dead.
The Shavuot
firstfruits offering was a different picture. The firstfruits of the wheat
harvest was offered in the form of two loaves with leaven. It would seem that
this offering is a picture of the believers – Jews and Gentiles – being
incorporated into the body of Messiah at Shavuot. And as the poor man’s food
signified Messiah and the rich man’s food represented believers in Messiah, we
are reminded that, as Paul says in 2 Cor. 8:9, Messiah became poor for our
sakes that we might become rich in Him.
There is a
further significance to the fact that two loaves were offered. The number two is
strongly associated in the Bible with witness. In Dt. 19:15, at least two
witnesses were required for an acceptable testimony in a court of Israelite law
and the principle finds a variety of applications within the New Covenant as, for
example, in Mk. 6:7 when Messiah sent out His disciples by twos in order to
preach the Good News. According to 1 Tim. 5:19, congregations are not to receive
an accusation against an elder without at least two witnesses and, says Peter
in
1 Pet. 3:7, in the marriage partnership there has to be agreement between both spouses for prayer to be accepted by God. Without two witnesses there is only opinion and following Pentecost God had both Jews and Gentiles as his witnesses to the world.
1 Pet. 3:7, in the marriage partnership there has to be agreement between both spouses for prayer to be accepted by God. Without two witnesses there is only opinion and following Pentecost God had both Jews and Gentiles as his witnesses to the world.
Moreover, the
offering of the loaves was accompanied by a number of sacrifices including, as
we read in Lv. 23: 19, a peace offering, in Hebrew a ‘shalom’. When the Apostle
Paul speaks to Gentile believers at Ephesus, he says in 2:14-18:
For [Messiah] himself is our peace
[offering], who has made us both [Jews and Gentiles] one and has broken down in
his flesh the dividing wall of hostility by abolishing the law of commandments
expressed in ordinances, that he might create in himself one new man in place
of the two, so making peace, and might reconcile us both to God in one body
through the cross, thereby killing the hostility.
The Sages
of Israel recognised that the nation’s destiny was to bless the world, and
regarded the coming of Ruth the Moabitess into Israel as a foreshadowing of the
coming of the Gentiles into the blessings of Israel. That is why the Book of
Ruth – which celebrates the coming of a Gentile into the commonwealth of Israel
at harvest time – is read in synagogues at Shavuot. Ruth was blessed by
becoming a member of Israel and Israel, in turn, was blessed by her becoming
the ancestor of King David and the Messiah. At Pentecost in 33AD, there were
Gentile proselytes, as well as natural Jews, incorporated into the commonwealth
of Israel. According to Rom. 11:11-15 and 25-26, Gentiles have been blessed by
Israel and are, in turn, called to be a blessing to the Jews, not least by
provoking them to jealousy.
The 3,000
Jews and proselytes who believed Peter’s preaching on the day of Pentecost were
the firstfruits of a harvest that would culminate in a world-wide ingathering
from all lands. Rev. 7 refers to the Gentile converts as a ‘great multitude
which no man could number, of all nations, tribes, peoples and tongues’ (note
the many ‘tongues’ of Acts 2). In Rev. 14:4 the 144,000 are identified as ‘firstfruits
to God and to the Lamb’ and it is to them, the first generation of Jewish
believers, that James addresses his epistle. According to James 1:1), his
readers were from ‘the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad’ and, as he
says in v.18 ‘a kind of firstfruits of His creatures’. While Peter, James, John
and the other apostles continued to reap the firstfruits of God’s harvest
within the house of Israel, Paul says in Gal. 2:9 that he and his companions were
reaping a harvest from among the nations.
***
What, then,
do the events of Pentecost as recorded in Acts say to us? The events of that
day bring together a number of threads from the Old Testament scriptures that
hints (some more strongly than others) at God’s plan and purpose for his
creation. The teaching of Pentecost encourages us to trust that God’s purposes
for creation will continue to unfold until at last all Israel is saved, the
people of God from all nations are gathered into the kingdom, and ‘the earth
shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD as the
waters cover the sea.’
However
difficult the task, however dark the days, the harvest nature of Pentecost
encourages us to pursue mission in the knowledge that the firstfruits of God’s
harvest which was presented to him on Mount Zion 2,000 years ago, guarantees a
full harvest from all nations that no man can number. Therefore, we cannot
afford the luxury of pessimism. In all our service, we can be ‘steadfast,
immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, knowing that in the Lord our
labour is not in vain.’ The kingdoms of this world have become the kingdoms of
our God and his Messiah!
I find some of the statements in this article difficult to square in the light of scripture such as "We must not think, therefore, that the Church was born at Pentecost in 33AD or that the Church has replaced Israel as the people of God. From the time of the Exodus, Israel was God’s ‘church,’ or assembly, and continues to be so"
ReplyDeleteNow as I understand scripture In Col 1:18 we read we are the body of Christ.
In Eph 2:11-16 we learn this body which is the church, is made up of both Jews & Gentiles and is called the 'One New Man'
In 1Cor 12:13 we learn that entrance into this body can only be by Spirit Baptism.
So then, if the church is the body of Christ, and it is!!
And if entrance into that body can only be by Spirit Baptism ,and it is!!
Then this is the unique birth of the church, as God has never done anything like it throughout history, and only since Acts 2 have we had Spirit Baptism. The church was a unique concept of God , which means that God has never done anything like it before. I say that because there are some who teach that the church began with Abraham or before, this is absolute nonsense.
Dr Alan Poyner-Levison Beiit Shalom Ministries
ReplyDeleteThank you.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, it might help if we remember the meaning of the root word for ‘church’ that appears in our English Bibles. If ‘ekklesia’ was translated simply as ‘assembly’ (as J N Darby does) the entire ‘Church’/Israel problem would evaporate. Robert Young in his 'Literal Translation of the New Testament' and George Ricker Berry in his Interlinear Greek-English New Testament also translate ‘ekklesia’ as ‘assembly.’ William Tyndale translates ‘ekklesia’ throughout his New Testament as ‘community,’ as does Daniel Gruber, in his translation of the New Testament, ‘The Messianic Writings’. God had a ‘community’ throughout the period of the Old Covenant and that community was Israel.
How many communities/assemblies does God have? Would you agree that under the Old Covenant, Israel is God’s ‘assembly’ or ‘congregation’? Does Israel continue to be God’s ‘assembly’ or ‘congregation’ under the New Covenant? If you believe God brought a new ‘community’/’assembly’ into being at Shavuot, you’ve unwittingly become a supersessionist because the world ain’t big enough for more than one ‘assembly’ of God.
Moreover, if there are two ‘assemblies’ – Israel and ‘the Church’ – to which of those ‘assemblies’ do messianic Jews belong? If they have left Israel to join ‘the Church,’ your contention simply provides fodder for those Jews who say Messianic believers are no longer Jewish.
Romans 11 is the clue here. From the time of the patriarchs there has always been one olive tree: Israel (see Jeremiah 11:16). There are not two olive trees. Nor has one tree been cut down and other planted in its place. If my contention is incorrect, the only alternative is Replacement Theology!
Messianic Jews don't leave anything when they become believers. You are grafted back into God’s ‘assembly,’ Israel. By the astonishing grace of God, Gentiles like me have been joined with you in God’s ‘community’ so that we have become ‘one new man.’
Whatever names are given to the God’s community – ‘Body of Messiah,’ ‘one new man,’ etc – the basic designation remains the same. Jews and Gentiles are both in God’s community and that community did not have its birthday at Shavuot.
Neither does it matter how we actually enter that ‘community’ – by being grafted back in as a natural branch (as Messianic Jews are) or by being ‘unnaturally’ grafted in (as I have been) – what matters is that believing Jews and Gentiles are in that community by grace through faith.
Incidentally, I don’t think ‘Spirit baptism’ in 1 Corinthians 12:13 is a reference to entry into the Body of Messiah. Whenever the Greek term ‘eis’ is used with regard to baptism, it never means ‘into’. A better translation of 1 Corinthians 13 would be, ‘By one Spirit we were all baptized with a view to one body…’ That fits the context of the passage which deals with the charismatic gifts which were meant to serve the unity of the Body of Messiah. But that’s another matter altogether. Feel free to come back on this.
I agree with you that Pentecost is not really the church's birthday - perhaps more like the church's Barmitzvah - a coming of age in maturity according to John Calvin. Anderew
ReplyDelete