Stephen Sizer is promoting a new publication After Zionism, edited by Antony Lowenstein and Ahmed Moore, about the search for a one state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Stephen Sizer admitted to me three years ago when we met for coffee, that a one-state solution would mean the end of Israel as a Jewish state.
According to
the publicity blurb one of the editors, Antony Loewenstein, is ‘an Australian
journalist, activist and blogger. He is the author of two bestselling books, My
Israel Question and The Blogging Revolution. He has written for The Guardian, The
Nation, Huffington Post, Haaretz and other prominent publications. He lives in
Sydney, Australia.’
Lowenstein
describes himself as ‘a non-practising atheist Jew’ and last Wednesday (22
August) he and Moor spoke at the School of Oriental and African Studies in
London to promote the book. Richard Millett was there and on his blog reports:
Loewenstein told
the audience of about 150 that Zionism actually is the issue here. Although it
is probably very hard to imagine in 2012 the idea of a Middle East country
called Israel that’s not a Zionist state, the truth is that it was impossible
equally to imagine a South African country that wasn’t wracked with apartheid.
Both
Loewenstein and Moor are big supporters of boycott, divestment and sanctions
against Israel. . .
Frank Barat, the Chairman of the meeting, is another supporter of boycott, divestment and
sanctions. In an online interview, Barat and his comrades were savaged by no less than Norman Finkelstein, one of Israel’s most
extreme critics. Finkelstein accused BDSers of silliness, childishness, leftist posturing, duplicity and dishonesty.
According to Finkelstein, the BDS movement is a cult that does not want Israel
to exist but is afraid to say so. His charge was justified when:
During the
Q&A, Jonathan Hoffman asked Loewenstein how many people Loewenstein thinks
should die for this one-state solution, that Loewenstein wants so much, to come
into existence. The idea being that Israelis are not going to vote themselves
out of existence, so presumably such a state could come about only by force
involving more bloodshed.
As
Loewenstein wasn’t quite answering the question he was pressed further by
Hoffman as to how many people Loewenstein thinks should die. First, Frank
Barat, the Chairman, answered '200,000' . Then Loewenstein answered, ‘Six million. That’s my answer. Write that
down.’
Mocking the
Holocaust, says Millet, seems to be becoming de rigeuer within anti-Israel
activism.
A supporter
of BDS, Jane Green, told Millett and Jonathan Hoffman in October 2011 that Israeli
Jews were ‘total Nazis’ who were using the Holocaust to ‘kill the Palestinians’
and to ‘commit genocide against
another people’.
I am firmly of the opinion that most pro-Palestinians are nothing of the sort; they are just anti-Israel and, as such, are anti-Jew.
I am firmly of the opinion that most pro-Palestinians are nothing of the sort; they are just anti-Israel and, as such, are anti-Jew.
No comments:
Post a Comment